jyrjjdjdiiedh

Here is the completed essay: It is widely believed that the significant disparities in salary between senior executives and other employees within a company are justified. I wholeheartedly support this viewpoint as it reflects the demanding nature of high-level positions. The significant gap between the salaries of managers and other employees mostly arises from the stringent requirements to strive for promotion. For a start, those working as senior executives in an organization usually bear more weighty responsibilities. Indeed, while junior employees typically focus on specific tasks, their senior counterparts are entrusted with shaping the strategic direction of a company, navigating complex challenges, and ensuring its long-term success. When companies encounter issues, senior managers are often the first to be held accountable. Such positions are not an easy role, which is why I believe it is justified for senior executives to earn significantly higher salaries than other workers. Another point worth mentioning is that senior managers are required to possess a vast amount of experience and skills, because of which, a competitive salary package is totally worthwhile. To attain a high-level position, it is not uncommon to encounter job descriptions requiring a minimum of five years of experience, in addition to the acquisition of multiple degrees and certifications to demonstrate competence. Furthermore, a generous salary for managers could also serve as effective motivation for employees. With significant rewards, staff tends to be encouraged to exert effort. If the salary differences among staff keep significant, individuals may feel demotivated. In conclusion, I strongly believe that the rationale for higher remuneration for senior managers is justified because it mirrors the value added by senior leadership as well as generates the necessary motivation in the workers.