giúpppppo mikkk The bar chart $\underline{illustrate^{(1)}}$ the gross domestic product generated from,the IT and Service Industry in the UK from 1992 to 2000. Overall, it,can be seen that both $\underline{decreased}^{(2)}$ as a percentage of GDP, but IT,remained at a $\underline{highest}~(3)$ rate throughout this time.,At the beginning of the period, in 1992, the Service Industry,accounted for 4 per cent of GDP, $although^{(4)}$ IT exceeded this, at just,over 6 per cent. Over the next four years, the levels became more,similar, with $\underline{each}^{(5)}$ components standing between 6 and just over 8,per cent. IT was still $lower^{(6)}$ overall, though it dropped slightly from,1994 to 1996.,But(7), over the following four years, the patterns of the two,components were noticeably $\underline{similar.^{(8)}}.^{(8)}$ The percentage of GDP from,IT increased quite $\underline{slightly}~^{(9)}$ to 12 in 1998 and then nearly 15 in 2000,,while the Service Industry stayed nearly $\underline{unchange^{(10)}},$ increasing to,only 8 per cent.

Question

Timi · Accepted Answer

1. illustrates
2. decreased
3. the highest
4. whereas
5. these
6. lower -> higher
   ( IT was still higher overall)
7. However
8. similar -> more similar ( But over the following four years, the patterns of the two components were noticeably more similar)
   or The same 
   ( But over the following four years, the patterns of the two components were noticeably the same)
9. slightly -> sharply
   ( The percentage of GDP from IT increased quite sharply to 12 in 1998 and then nearly 15 in 2000)
10. unchanged