
01/12/2023
01/12/2023
Many students are made to attend certain classes when they are 15 years of age, while others are required to learn various subjects before leaving school. Although an education system with a broad range of subjects can provide diverse knowledge, that with a narrower range is better as learners have more time for other activities desired.
Those supporting the former education system may claim that students can access a wider range of knowledge that they may need in their later life. Having a chance to attend many classes, students are taught numerous lessons related to various fields, many of which can be of great help when they grow up. For instance, in Vietnam, students aiming at engineering courses in university are only required to have good grades in Maths and Physics. However, the knowledge they have acquired in non-major classes like English or Computer Science can offer them a competitive edge when they apply for a job in a multinational company, compared to those who are not familiar with foreign languages or computers.
On the other hand, students who study only a few subjects have more time for other purposes than those studying so many. With fewer subjects to learn, they have extra time either for stress relievers such as playing some sport or taking a rest or for further research related to their chosen subjects. The former activity helps students relieve pressure at school and recharge their energy, whereas the latter is a good way of reviewing the lesson taught in class. Scientifically, these activities increase their study efficiency and academic performance, so such an education system is much better than that forcing students to learn various subjects.
In conclusion, although the knowledge learnt in various classes is potentially helpful, I believe that a study program with not so many classes is more beneficial to students who can have more time for deeper study or relaxation.
01/12/2023
Different education systems have varying approaches when it comes to subject specialization at the age of 15. Let's explore the benefits of each system before discussing which one might be better:
Specialization at age 15:
1. Depth of knowledge: By allowing students to focus on specific subjects at an early age, they can develop a deeper understanding and expertise in those areas. This specialization can prepare them for future careers or higher education in specialized fields.
2. Efficient use of time: Specializing in certain subjects allows students to allocate more time and resources to those areas, potentially leading to greater proficiency and mastery.
Wide range of subjects until leaving school:
1. Holistic development: Studying a wide range of subjects exposes students to various disciplines, fostering a well-rounded education. This approach encourages critical thinking, creativity, and a broader understanding of the world.
2. Flexibility and exploration: Delaying specialization allows students to explore different subjects and discover their interests and talents. It provides them with a broader knowledge base, enabling them to make informed decisions about their future academic and career paths.
Determining which system is better depends on various factors, including cultural context and individual preferences. However, a balanced approach that combines elements of both systems might be advantageous. This could involve a broad curriculum in the early years, allowing students to explore different subjects, followed by gradual specialization in later stages based on their interests and aptitudes. Such an approach would provide students with a solid foundation while allowing them to develop expertise in specific areas.
Ultimately, the goal of any educational system should be to equip students with the necessary skills, knowledge, and adaptability to succeed in their chosen paths, whether specialized or diverse.
Nếu bạn muốn hỏi bài tập
Các câu hỏi của bạn luôn được giải đáp dưới 10 phút
CÂU HỎI LIÊN QUAN
7 giờ trước
7 giờ trước
12/12/2025
12/12/2025
Top thành viên trả lời