Đăng ký học gia sư
Tất cả
Toán Học
Vật Lý
Hóa Học
Tiếng Anh
Ngữ Văn
Sinh Học
Địa Lý
GDCD
GDĐP
Tin Học
Công Nghệ
Nhạc Họa
KHTN
Sử & Địa
Khác
In today’s world, private companies rather than government pay for and conduct most scientific research. Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
0
-
Câu trả lời phải chính xác, đầy đủ dựa trên kiến thức xác thực:
- ✔ Đối với câu hỏi trắc nghiệm: Đưa đáp án lựa chọn + giải thích lý do chọn đáp án.
- ✔ Đối với câu hỏi tự luận: Đưa lời giải và đáp án cho câu hỏi.
- ✔ Đối với câu hỏi trả lời ngắn: Đưa ra đáp án + giải thích lý do.
- ✔ Chấp nhận sử dụng ảnh do thành viên viết tay, ảnh cần rõ nét, không bị mờ, vỡ ảnh.
- Sử dụng ngôn ngữ rõ ràng, dễ hiểu.
- Tránh đưa ra các ý kiến cá nhân mang tính chất chủ quan.
- Nếu sử dụng thông tin từ nguồn khác, phải trích dẫn nguồn đầy đủ và chính xác.
- Tuyệt đối không được sao chép các thông tin từ các trang khác, từ AI hoặc chatGPT.
01/12/2023
0 
01/12/2023
Nowadays, most scientific studies are financed and carried out by private enterprises instead of the governing bodies. In my opinion, the benefits of this are greater than its drawbacks.
On the one hand, that research is paid and conducted by private companies can be greatly beneficial. In fact, unlike governmental organizations, most companies’ primary objectives are profits, so their motivation to minimize the costs arising upon research activities is much more considerable. Therefore, they tend to prevent their scientists and other workers more strictly from wasting any resources, including time and money; as a result, their outcomes can be quicker and more money-efficient. In addition, when the government leaves scientific research for businesses, the financial pressure on the national budget can be partly relieved. Instead, it can be allocated for investing in other important sectors such as education or transportation.
On the other hand, I believe that letting private businesses sponsor or undertake such studies will bring about more significant disadvantages. First, there are very few private companies that are willing to do unpaid work while shouldering a huge financial burden at the same time. Consequently, they may require the public to pay to access or share their research results, so that they can afford to cover their expenses as well as to ensure their personal incomes. Second, when allowing companies to do scientific research, the authorities can hardly make sure the entire research process is under supervision. It is possible that companies with the top priority being maximizing profits will sell their research to other organizations, such as terrorists or criminals, who take advantage of such research to harm society.
In conclusion, I claim that private investment in and conduct of scientific research may result in several advantages which are, however, outweighed by the undesirable consequences.
0 01/12/2023
Nowadays, most scientific studies are financed and carried out by private enterprises instead of the governing bodies. In my opinion, the benefits of this are greater than its drawbacks.
On the one hand, that research is paid and conducted by private companies can be greatly beneficial. In fact, unlike governmental organizations, most companies’ primary objectives are profits, so their motivation to minimize the costs arising upon research activities is much more considerable. Therefore, they tend to prevent their scientists and other workers more strictly from wasting any resources, including time and money; as a result, their outcomes can be quicker and more money-efficient. In addition, when the government leaves scientific research for businesses, the financial pressure on the national budget can be partly relieved. Instead, it can be allocated for investing in other important sectors such as education or transportation.
On the other hand, I believe that letting private businesses sponsor or undertake such studies will bring about more significant disadvantages. First, there are very few private companies that are willing to do unpaid work while shouldering a huge financial burden at the same time. Consequently, they may require the public to pay to access or share their research results, so that they can afford to cover their expenses as well as to ensure their personal incomes. Second, when allowing companies to do scientific research, the authorities can hardly make sure the entire research process is under supervision. It is possible that companies with the top priority being maximizing profits will sell their research to other organizations, such as terrorists or criminals, who take advantage of such research to harm society.
In conclusion, I claim that private investment in and conduct of scientific research may result in several advantages which are, however, outweighed by the undesirable consequences.
0 01/12/2023
The question of whether the advantages of private companies conducting and funding most scientific research outweigh the disadvantages is subjective and can vary depending on different perspectives. However, I will present some arguments for both sides.
Advantages of private companies conducting and funding scientific research:
1. Financial resources: Private companies often have significant financial resources to invest in scientific research. This allows for larger-scale projects and the potential for more breakthroughs and advancements.
2. Efficiency and innovation: Private companies are driven by competition and profit motives, which can lead to greater efficiency and innovation in research. They may be more focused on practical applications and commercialization of scientific discoveries.
3. Industry-specific research: Private companies may specialize in specific industries and have a deeper understanding of the challenges and needs within those sectors. This can lead to targeted research that addresses industry-specific problems.
Disadvantages of private companies conducting and funding scientific research:
1. Bias and conflicts of interest: Private companies may have vested interests in the outcomes of research, which can lead to bias and conflicts of interest. This can potentially compromise the objectivity and integrity of the research.
2. Lack of transparency: Private companies may not always disclose all research findings, especially if they are not favorable or do not align with their business interests. This lack of transparency can hinder scientific progress and the sharing of knowledge.
3. Neglect of basic research: Private companies may prioritize research that has immediate commercial value, neglecting basic research that may not have immediate practical applications but is essential for advancing scientific knowledge.
In conclusion, the advantages and disadvantages of private companies conducting and funding scientific research are complex and multifaceted. While private companies can bring financial resources and efficiency to research, there is a need to ensure transparency, avoid bias, and not neglect basic research. A balanced approach that involves collaboration between private companies, government funding, and academic institutions may be the most effective way to advance scientific knowledge and address societal needs.
1 Nếu bạn muốn hỏi bài tập
Các câu hỏi của bạn luôn được giải đáp dưới 10 phút
CÂU HỎI LIÊN QUAN
07/06/2025
07/06/2025
Top thành viên trả lời
Địa chỉ: Số 21 Ngõ Giếng, Phố Đông Các, Phường Ô Chợ Dừa, Quận Đống Đa, Thành phố Hà Nội, Việt Nam.
